Securonix Threat Research: Detecting Persistent Cloud Infrastructure/Hadoop/YARN Attacks Using Security Analytics: Moanacroner, XBash, and Others

By Oleg Kolesnikov and Harshvardhan Parashar, Securonix Threat Research Team


Figure 1: Moanacroner Establishes Persistence After Initial Cloud YARN/Hadoop Infection Using Crontabs


In recent months, we have been observing an increase in the number of automated attacks targeting exposed cloud infrastructure/Hadoop/YARN instances. Some of the attacks we have been seeing – for example, Moanacroner (a variant of Sustes [11]) – are fairly trivial, targeted single-vector/single-platform attacks where the focus is mainly on cryptomining.

Some attacks, however, are multi-vector/multi-platform threats where multiple functionalities – including cryptomining, ransomware, and botnet/worms for both Linux and Windows – are combined as part of the same malicious threat (for example, XBash).

The Securonix Threat Research Team has been actively investigating and closely monitoring these persistent malicious attacks impacting exposed cloud infrastructure in order to help our customers prevent, detect, and mitigate/respond to the attacks. Below is a summary of what we currently know, and our recommendations for possible mitigations and Securonix predictive indicators that can be used to detect such attacks.



Figure 2: Cloud Infrastructure Hadoop/YARN Logs Containing the Initial Infection/Malicious Commands Launched by Various Malicious Threat Actors


Here is a summary of some of the key details about some of the persistent cloud infrastructure/Hadoop/YARN attacks we have been observing.


In most cases, the focus of the attacks is on installing a second-stage payload for cryptomining and/or remote access. In other cases, the malware propagates and infects the exposed services, removes data, and installs second-stage cryptomining and ransomware payloads. For example, in the case of Xbash (which was reported a few months ago), the malware deletes the databases instead of encrypting them, and does not have any functionality to backup/recover the files.

Infiltration Vector(s)

Some of the key vectors we have been observing in these attacks involve the use of Hadoop unauthenticated command execution [2] and Redis remote command execution [3]. There have also been other vectors used, including ActiveMQ (Arbitrary File Execution) [4].

Command and Control (C2)

There are a number of different C2 servers observed, and the hop points change continuously. Some malware fetches a hardcoded list of C2 server domain names from a pastebin webpage. C2 servers are then used to collect the target IP addresses and domains, download additional malicious scripts to perform cryptojacking, fetch additional username/password lists to be used for brute-force attacks, and report the results.


Most of the malicious implants observed maintain persistence by creating a cronjob entry, usually by leveraging different files (for example, on Linux: /etc/crontab, /etc/cron.d/root, /etc/cron.d/apache, /var/spool/cron/root, etc.), or by creating a malicious startup item if running on Windows, in order to download additional malicious stagers from a C2 server.

Observed Artifacts

Hash Values


















C2 IP/Stager Addresses


Figure 3: Xbash Maintains Persistence by Setting Up Cronjobs to Download Additional Malicious Scripts

Some Relevant Behaviors – Highlights

There are many common behaviors shared by the malicious threat actors we’ve been observing, including the infection vectors mentioned above, the persistence mechanisms, and some of the actions on objectives, including cryptomining payloads. XBash is a good example of a more advanced threat actor leveraging many of these common behaviors, so below we will provide some highlights of some of the relevant behaviors used by Xbash from a detection perspective.


Figure 4: Target Domain List Fetched by Xbash from One of the C2s


The Xbash botnet has been active since May 2018 and has shown a distinguishing combination of cryptojacking, cybersabotage, and multi-platform characteristics. Xbash malware infects Linux and Windows systems with the aim of deleting critical databases, installing cryptojacking scripts, and asking for ransoms by impersonating a ransomware attack. The Xbash botnet has been scanning the target domains and IP addresses specified by the C2 for multiple services running on different ports including [1]:

HTTP: 80, 8080, 8888, 8000, 8001, 8088

MySQL/MariaDB: 3309, 3308,3360 3306, 3307, 9806, 1433

MySQL: 3306

Memcached: 11211

RDP: 3389

VNC: 5900, 5901, 5902, 5903

FTP: 21

MongoDB: 27017

PostgreSQL: 5432

Telnet: 23, 2323

SNMP: 161

Oracle Database: 1521

NTP: 123

CouchDB: 5984

Rexec: 512

Redis: 6379, 2379

ElasticSearch: 9200

UPnP/SSDP: 1900

DNS: 53

LDAP: 389

Rlogin: 513

Rsh: 514

Rsync: 873


Figure 5: Password Dictionary Fetched from One of the C2s for Brute-Force Attacks

The malware infiltrates and spreads by brute-forcing the weak passwords configured on the above services, or by exploiting one of three vulnerabilities found on Hadoop YARN Resource Manager, Redis, and ActiveMQ.

Once the malware is successfully able to log into the database services (MYSQL, PostgreSQL, MongoDB, or phpMyAdmin) it deletes the existing databases stored on the server and creates a database with a ransom note specifying the amount and the bitcoin wallet.

While infecting a vulnerable Redis service Xbash determines if the server is installed on Windows or Linux by identifying the location of the installation from the config. If the Redis is installed on Windows, the malware creates a startup item for persistence and downloads additional scripts and executables to perform cryptojacking or install ransomware [1].


Figure 6: Malicious Script Kills Any Other Cryptomining Services Found Running


Detection – Sample Securonix Spotter Search Queries

Some sample Securonix Spotter search queries to assist with the detection of existing infections.

ETDR Process Monitoring (Process Hash Conditions)

(rg_category contains “Endpoint” OR rg_category contains “ips” OR rg_category contains “ids”)  AND

(customstring3=7a18c7bdf0c504832c8552766dcfe0ba33dd5493daa3d9dbe9c985c1ce36e5aa or

customstring3=0b9c54692d25f68ede1de47d4206ec3cd2e5836e368794eccb3daa632334c641 or

customstring3=dbc380cbfb1536dfb24ef460ce18bccdae549b4585ba713b5228c23924385e54 or

customstring3=5b790f02bdb26b6b6b270a5669311b4f231d17872aafb237b7e87b6bbb57426d or

customstring3=e59be6eec9629d376a8a4a70fe9f8f3eec7b0919019f819d44b9bdd1c429277c or

customstring3=f808a42b10cf55603389945a549ce45edc6a04562196d14f7489af04688f12bc or

customstring3=dcd37e5b266cc0cd3fab73caa63b218f5b92e9bd5b25cf1cacf1afdb0d8e76ff or

customstring3=de63ce4a42f06a5903b9daa62b67fcfbdeca05beb574f966370a6ae7fd21190d or

customstring3=09968c4573580398b3269577ced28090eae4a7c326c1a0ec546761c623625885 or

customstring3=a27acc07844bb751ac33f5df569fd949d8b61dba26eb5447482d90243fc739af or

customstring3=f888dda9ca1876eba12ffb55a7a993bd1f5a622a30045a675da4955ede3e4cb8 or

customstring3=31155bf8c85c6c6193842b8d09bda88990d710db9f70efe85c421f1484f0ee78 or

customstring3=725efd0f5310763bc5375e7b72dbb2e883ad90ec32d6177c578a1c04c1b62054 or

customstring3=d7fbd2a4db44d86b4cf5fa4202203dacfefd6ffca6a0615dca5bc2a200ad56b6 or

customstring3=ece3cfdb75aaabc570bf38af6f4653f73101c1641ce78a4bb146e62d9ac0cd50 or

customstring3=2103af76b361efbebca8bb59f94ee4b3 or



Figure 7: Examples of Changes to Crontab Made by Malicious Implants in FIM Logs

Network Monitoring (Network Traffic to C2/Stagers)

rg_category contains “Firewall” OR rg_category contains “proxy”) AND (destinationaddress IN “”,“”,“”,“”,“”,“”, “”, “”, “”, “”, “”, “”, “”, “”, “”, “”, “”)

Securonix Detection

Some Relevant Log/Data Source Examples

VPC EDR logs (sysmon, osquery, Bit9/Carbonblack, etc.)

Cloud infrastructure application/database/webserver/Hadoop/YARN logs

VPC flow logs, etc.

Windows Event Logs

Some Examples of Securonix Predictive Indicators 

Below is a summary of some of the relevant Securonix predictive indicators to increase the chances of early detection of this, and potentially other future variants of the threats mentioned above, in your cloud infrastructure. Figure 8 shows a practical example of detection of the malicious threats impacting cloud infrastructure described above using Securonix.


Figure 8: Practical Example of Detection Using Securonix


  • Suspicious Filesystem Activity – Unusual FIM Change For File Analytic
    • One possible example is an unusual change to one of the crontab files (see Figure 7).
  • Suspicious Process Activity – Unusual Parent-Child Relationship For Host Analytic
    • One possible example is an unusual parent process for wget or curl execution that is commonly used by malicious threat actors as part of staging the attacks.
  • Suspicious Hadoop Activity – Unusual Container Command Launch for Host Analytic
    • One possible example is running unexpected commands as part of YARN manager activity (see Figure 2).
  • Suspicious Network Activity – Unusual Outbound Connection For Container Analytic
  • Suspicious Windows Activity – Unusual CPU Utilization Amount For Host Analytic
  • Suspicious Database Activity – Unusual Source IP Address for User Analytic

and a number of other Securonix behavioral analytics/predictive indicators including  EDR-SYM19-ERI, EDR-SYM2-ERI, PXY-PAN5-TAN, WEL-WOT1-BPI, WEL-TAN2-BPI, WEL-SCH2-RUN, EDR-SYM12-RUN, and others.

Mitigation and Prevention – Securonix Recommendations

Here are some of the Securonix recommendations to help customers prevent and/or mitigate the attack:

  1. Continuously review your cloud infrastructure services’ exposure to the internet, including Hadoop/YARN, Redis, and ActiveMQ, and restrict access whenever possible to reduce the potential attack surface (see,, Also, consider leveraging a centralized patch management system.
  2. Consider implementing Redis in protected mode (see
  3. Implement strong password policies for your services mentioned above as some of the malicious threat actors described, such as Xbash, use password brute-force to propagate.



[1] Claud Xiao, Cong Zheng and Xingyu Jin. Xbash Combines Botnet, Ransomware, Coinmining in Worm that Targets Linux and Windows. Unit 42. September 17, 2018. accessed: 01-14-2019.

[2] Rapid7. Hadoop YARN ResourceManager Unauthenticated Command Execution. Rapid7. March 23, 2018. Last accessed: 01-14-2019.

[3] Antirez. Redis Remote Command Execution Redis Remote Command Execution. Packet Storm. Nov 3, 2015. Last accessed: 01-14-2019.

[4] NVD. CVE-2016-3088 Detail. National Vulnerability Database. June 01, 2016. Last accessed: 01-14-2019.

[5] Omri Ben Bassat. Iron Cybercrime Group Under The Scope. Intezer. May 29, 2018.  Last accessed: 01-14-2019.

[6] Blockchain. Bitcoin Address. September 26, 2018. Last accessed: 01-14-2019.

[7] Blockchain. Bitcoin Address. October 02, 2018. Last accessed: 01-14-2019.

[8] Antirez. A few things about Redis security. November 3, 2015. Last accessed: 01-14-2019.

[9] Green-m. hadoop_unauth_exec.rb. October 19, 2016. Last accessed: 01-14-2019.

[10] FortiGuard Labs. Apache.Hadoop.YARN.ResourceManager.Command.Execution. Fortinet. Last accessed: 01-14-2019.

[11] Marco Ramilli. Sustes Malware: CPU for Monero. Last accessed: 01-14-2019.

Other Securonix Threat Research

Visit the Securonix Threat Research Lab

Securonix Threat Labs Monthly Intelligence Insights – April 2024
Securonix EON Takes Center Stage at Record-Breaking RSA Conference
What is Going on with the SIEM market?
Analysis and Detection of CLOUD#REVERSER: An Attack Involving Threat Actors...